Machiavelli fable response

The context is set in Belfagor through an explanation of the initial conflict (the question of whether wives were truly the cause of misery), the nomination of a central character who will pursue a solution (the archdevil Belfagor), and a basic plan of action that the character will take (finding a wife for himself and reporting back). I think these three serve as the three standard European context elements. The turning point is Belfagor/Roderigo’s proposal to Gianmatteo: “In reply, Roderigo said: ‘My brother, I am deeply in your debt and want to satisfy you in every way; and so that you may believe what I can do I shall tell you who I am.’” At this point, Roderigo has in a way shifted the role of main character to Gianmatteo, and also switched the plotline. This is done through a few general core actions – Roderigo going broke, running from his wife, and proposing a deal with Gianmatteo. I’m not sure I see one central moral within the story, especially since it’s divided into the two main parts (one about Roderigo, one about Gianmatteo). The overall moral seems to speak about the problems that money can bring, although this is not stated explicitly. The main reversal was Belfagor’s threat to Gianmatteo, placing Gianmatteo in a sort of “jeopardy,” and creating a hurdle for Gianmatteo to overcome. The resolution comes in Gianmatteo’s defeat of Belfagor by scaring him with threats of his wife. What I liked most about the piece was its tone. It was pleasant without being overly simplistic and was an enjoyable read.